Changing the State of State-Level Energy Programs: Policy Diffusion, Economic Stimulus, and New Federalism Paradigms

  • Benjamin H. Deitchman
Keywords: Energy

Abstract

This article will pose the question: What led to the climate and clean energy policies in Massachusetts, Minnesota, Texas, and Utah (four states for which current or former governors ran for president in the 2012 election) and around the country since 2001? It will highlight the role of governors and the $3.1 billion investment of federal resources into state-level clean energy activities through the Recovery Act as a foundation for assessment and will provide a framework for analyzing policy decision-making. Public policy theory, including the policy diffusion model, will provide background to understand the influences on state-level policy adoption. With the primary goal of the Recovery Act to improve a struggling economy, this article will explore the critical connection between economic development and clean energy resources that impacted these choices under expedited procedures. In addition, the approach to clean energy policy will show changes in American federalism and the potential of polycentric governance. While it is a unique confluence of events that led to the current policy environment, the results of further study will provide generalizable information on state-level learning, policy-motivations, economic decision-making, procedures in environmental policy, and the relationships of actors at multiple levels of governance. In a dissenting Supreme opinion in 1932, Justice Louis Brandies wrote, “A single courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country. … ” This article and proposed research program will analyze the policy experiments in states across the country—often led through gubernatorial initiative— in tackling the interrelated challenges of climate change and energy security in the twenty-first century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Benjamin H. Deitchman

Benjamin Deitchman is a doctoral candidate in the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology, where he works as a member of the Climate and Energy Policy Laboratory (CEPL) and expects to finish his degree in 2013. His policy analyses focus on overcoming barriers to energy efficiency in commercial and industrial facilities, green jobs, and the co-benefits of clean energy programs, particularly at the state and local levels. Mr. Deitchman also conducts research and evaluation in education policy. He has taught courses in government, energy policy, and engineering ethics. He previously served as the regional program coordinator at the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) and holds a Master of Public Administration degree from the George Washington University and Bachelors of Arts in History from the Johns Hopkins University. Mr. Deitchman was the founding president of the Public Policy Graduate Students Association at Georgia Tech and his email address is bhd@gatech.edu. This article is part of Benjamin Deitchman’s dissertation effort, “Why U.S. States Became Leaders in Climate and Energy Policy: Innovation Through Competition in Federalism.”

References

Madison, J. (1788). Federalist #46, The Federalist Papers.

Brandeis, L.D. (1932). New State Ice Company v. Liebmann (Dissenting Opinion).

U.S. Supreme Court 285 U.S. 262.

Brooks, G.E. (1961). When Governors Convene. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins

Press.

Ransone Jr., C.B. (1982). The American Governorship. Westport, CT: Greenwood

Press.

Beyle, T.L., & Munchmore, L.R. (1983). Governors and Intergovernmental Relations:

Middlemen in the Federal System. In T.L. Beyle & L.R. Munchmore (Eds.),

Being Governor. Durham, NC: Duke Press Policy Studies.

Harrigan, J.J. (1988). Politics and Policy in States and Communities (6th ed.). New

York: Longman.

Stone, D. (2002). The Policy Paradox (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

United States Department of Energy. (2011). State Energy Program. Retrieved

December 1, 2011, from www.doe.gov/recovery.

Grunwald, M. (2012). The New New Deal. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Biden, JR. (2009, February 27). Green Jobs are a Way to Aid the Middle Class.

Originally published in the Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/27/2009.

Rosencranz, A. & Conklin, R. (2010). National Policy. In Climate Change Science

and Policy. Schneider, S., Rosezcranz, R., Mastrandrea, M., & Kuntz-Duriseta, K,

eds. New York: Island Press.

Pollin, R., Garrett-Peltier, H., Heintz, J., & Scharber, H. (2008). Green recovery:

A program to create good jobs and start building a low-carbon economy. Center for

American Progress: Washington DC.

Grunwald 2012.

Stern, N.H., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., et al.

(2006). Stern Review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.

Nordhaus, W.D. (2006). The” Stern Review” on the Economics of Climate Change:

National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.

Gulliver, J.W., & Wheeler, K.A. (2008). Diversified Leadership for Moving beyond

the Carbon Economy in the United States. In D.N. Zillman, C. Redgwell,

Y.O. Omorogbe & L.K. Barrera-Hernandez (Eds.), Beyond the Carbon Economy.

Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Lutsey, N.P., & Sperling, D. (2008). America’s Bottom-Up Climate Change Mitigation

Policy. Energy Policy, 36(4), 673-685.

Rabe, B. (2008). States on steroids: The intergovernmental odyssey of American

climate policy. Review of Policy Research, 25(2), 105-128.

Revesz, R. (1992). Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the Raceto-

the-Bottom Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation. NYUL Rev., 67,

Fredriksson, P., & Millimet, D. (2002). Strategic interaction and the determination

of environmental policy across U.S. states. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 101-

Brown, M., & Sovacool, B. (2011). Climate Change and Global Energy Security. Cambridge,

MA: MIT Press.

Buchanan, J.M. (1995). Federalism as an ideal political order and an objective for

constitutional reform. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(2), 19-28.

Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political

Economy, 64(5), 416-424.

Nathan, R.P. (2008). Updating Theories of American Federalism. In T. J. Conlan

& P. Posner (Eds.), Intergovernmental Management in the 21 Century. Washington,

DC: Brookings Institution.

Shannon, J., & Edwin Kee, J. (1989). The rise of competitive federalism. Public

Budgeting & Finance, 9(4), 5-20.

Rabe, B. (2011). Contested Federalism and American Climate Policy. Publius: The

Journal of Federalism, 41(3), 494.

Derthick, M. (2010). Compensatory Federalism. In B. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse Governance.

Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Posner, P. (2010). The Politics of Vertical Diffusion: The States and Climate

Change. In B. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Press.

Walker, J. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. The

American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899.

Weyland, K. (2006). Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton

University Press.

Karch, A. (2007). Democratic Laboratories. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan

Press.

Boushey, G. (2010). Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Polsby, N.W. (1984). Political Innovation in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University

Press.

Schlesinger, J.A. (1966). Amibition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

Rittel, H. W.J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.

Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.

Stern et al. 2006

Brown & Sovacool 2011

Deitchman, B., Brown, M., & Baer, P. (2011). Green Jobs from Industrial Energy

Efficiency. Energy Productivity in Industry: Partners and Opportunities, 2011

American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) Summer Study on

Energy Efficiency in Industry. Washington, DC: ACEEE.

Revesz, R. (1992). Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the Raceto-

the-Bottom Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation. NYUL Rev., 67,

Derthick 2010

Rabe, B. (2009). Governing the Climate from Sacramento. In S. Goldsmith & D.F.

Kettl (Eds.), Unlocking the Power of Networks. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Press.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2006, August 1). California and UK in

climate pact. BBC News.

Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S.D. (2010). Multilevel Governance and Transatlantic Climate

Change Politics. In B. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse Governance. Washington, DC:

Brookings Institution Press.

Hollis, D.B. (2010). Unpacking the Compact Clause. Texas Law Review, 88(4), 741-

Frederiksson &Millimet 2002

Rabe 2011

Geri, L.R., & McNabb, D.E. (2011). Energy Policy in the U.S. Boca Raton, FL: CRC

Press.

Yergin, D. (2012, June 9). America’s New Energy Reality. The New York Times.

Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Theobald, N. (2011). Claiming credit in the U.S. federal

system: Testing a model of competitive federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism,

(2), 232-256.

Grunwald 2012

Engel, K. (2009). Whither Subnational Climate Change Initiatives in the Wake of

Federal Climate Legislation? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(3), 432.

Rabe 2008

Herzik, E.B. (1991). Policy agendas and gubernatorial leadership. Gubernatorial

leadership and state policy, 25, 37.

Heidbreder, B. (2012). Agenda Setting in the States: How Politics and Policy

Needs Shape Gubernatorial Agendas. Politics & Policy, 40(2), 296-319.

Sciortino, M., Neubauer, M., Vaidyanathan, S., Chittum, A., Hayes, S., Nowak, S.,

et al. (2011). The 2011 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. Washington, DC: American

Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE).

Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2012). State Energy Data System. Retrieved

September 1, 2012, from http://www.eia.gov/state/seds/.

Rabe 2008

Sciortino et al. 2011

Database of State Incentives for Efficiency and Renewables (DSIRE). (2012).

Database of State Incentives for Efficiency and Renewables (DSIRE). Retrieved

September 1, 2012, from www.dsire.org

EIA 2012

Galbraith, K. (2009, July 1). Contest: Replace the ‘Saudi Arabia’ Trope! The New

York Times.

EIA 2012

Texas Office of the Governor. (2010). Texas Takes Legal Action Against Federal

Government Over EPA CO2 Mandates. Retrieved September, 2012, from http://

governor.state.tx.us/news/press-release/14253/

Sciortino et al. 2011

EIA 2012

National Governors Association. (2012). The Governors Speak: A Summary of

the 2012 State of the State Addresses. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.

National Governors Association. (2008). Securing a Clean Energy Future. Washington,

DC: National Governors Association.

Ibid.

Balla, S. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations.

American Politics Research, 29(3), 221.

Koski, C. (2010). Greening America’s Skylines: The Diffusion of Low Salience

Policies. Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 93-117.

Brown, M., & Chandler, S. (2008). Governing Confusion: How Statutes, Fiscal

Policy, and Regulations Impede Clean Energy Technologies. Stanford Law and

Policy Review (19), 3, 472-509.

Stavins, R.N. (2000). Market-Based Environmental Policies. In P.R. Portney &

R.N. Stavins (Eds.), Public Policies for Environmental Protection (2nd ed.). Washington,

DC: Resources for the Future Press.

True, J.L., Jones, B.D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Punctuated-equilibrium theory:

Explaining stability and change in American policymaking. In P.A. Sabatier

(Ed.), Theories Of The Policy Process (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press

DOE 2012

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Board. (2011) Recovery Act Homepage.

Retrieved November 25, 2011 from www.recovery.gov.

Grunwald 2012

Deitchman, Brown, & Baer 2011

New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA).

(2008). New York Energy $mart Program Evaluation and Status Report, Year

Ending December 31, 2007. NYSERDA, Albany, NY.

National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO). (2008). Using

Energy Efficiency delivered through Energy Savings Performance Contracting as

a Direct and Immediate Stimulus to Economic Recovery. NAESCO: Washington,

DC.

Rose, C. (2008). Federalism and Climate Change: The Role of the States in a Future

Federal Regime-An Introduction. Ariz. L. Rev., 50, 673.

Brown & Chandler 2008

Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge,

UK: Cambridge University Press.

Andersson, K. and Ostrom, E. (2008). “Analyzing decentralized resource regimes

from a polycentric perspective,” Policy Science 41(1).

Brown & Sovacool 2011

Published
2014-04-01
Section
Articles