Fair Dynamic Pricing for Advanced Metering Infrastructure

  • Daniel J. Rozell
Keywords: Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering Infrastructure

Abstract

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), a subset of smart grid technologies, improves information exchange between electric utility operators and consumers. AMI allows for real-time dynamic pricing where the utility operator can charge variable prices depending on load demand and the varying cost of delivering electricity. While many studies have shown that dynamic pricing improves system efficiency and reduces costs for most consumers, there is much less discussion of the relative fairness of various dynamic pricing structures some of which have the potential to be regressive compared to traditional flat-rate pricing. This is considered unfair by ratepayer advocates and fairness issues often arise in discussions of dynamic pricing at state level public utility commissions. While a tradeoff between efficiency and equity exists, this author argues that only minor compromises are necessary if the right dynamic pricing options are used. Forms of dynamic pricing that guarantee no increased costs for any individual consumer are less likely to be labeled as unfair. If utilities offer default dynamic pricing structures that are universally perceived as fair, AMI will face one less hurdle to widespread acceptance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniel J. Rozell

Daniel J. Rozell, P.E., is a consultant with more than ten years experience in public safety, energy and environmental systems. He is also currently a doctoral student in the Department of Technology & Society at Stony Brook University. His email address is daniel.rozell@ stonybrook.edu.

References

National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). 2008. Modern Grid Strategy-

Powering our 21st-Century Economy, V1.0 Advanced Metering Infrastructure.

http://www.netl.doe.gov/smartgrid/referenceshelf/whitepapers/AMI%20

White%20paper %20final%20021108%20%282%29%20APPROVED_2008_02_12.

pdf

Herter, K. 2007. Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity.

Energy Policy. 35(4): 2121-2130

Morgan R. 2009. Rethinking ‘Dumb’ Rates, Public Utilities Fortnightly. March. 2009,

-38

Faruqui, A,. Hledik R., Sergici, S. 2010. Rethinking Prices: The changing architecture

of demand response in America, Public Utilities Fortnightly. January. 2010.

-39

Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, D.A., and Laitner, J.A. 2010. Advanced Metering

Initiatives and Residential Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household

Electricity-Saving Opportunities. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

Washington, D.C. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/e105/

California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). 2011. Health Impacts

of Radio Frequency Exposure from Smart Meters. http://www.ccst.us/

publications/2011/2011smart-final.pdf

Pavlidodu, N., Has Vinck A.J., Yazdani J., Honary B. 2003. Power line communications:

state of the art and future trends. IEEE Communications. 41(4): 34-40

McDaniel, P., McLaughlin, S. 2009. Security and Privacy Challenges in the Smart

Grid. IEEE Security & Privacy. 7(3): 75-77

Bunzl, M. 2010. Is Flat Fair? The Electricity Journal. 23(6): 8-12

Alexander, B.R. 2010. Dynamic Pricing? Not So Fast! A Residential Consumer

Perspective. The Electricity Journal. 23(6): 39-49

Klinenberg, E. 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. University

of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Nord, M., Kantor, L.S. 2006. Seasonal variation in food insecurity is associated

with heating and cooling costs among low-income elderly Americans. The Journal

of Nutrition. 136(11): 2939-44.

Darby, S.J. 2009. Estimated Conservation Impact of Providing Daily Gas Information

to Consumers. Rebuttal Testimony of Sarah J. Darby, May 7, 2009. Public

Utilities Commission of California. http://www.socalgas.com/regulatory/

documents/a-08-09-023/Testimony/errata/Chapter%2005%20Conservation%20

Impacts-S_Darby_Errata.pdf

von Schnitzler, A. 2008. Citizenship Prepaid: Water, Calculability, and Techno-

Politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. 34(4): 899-917

Fróes Lima, C.A., Portillo Navas, J.R. 2012. Smart metering and systems to support

a conscious use of water and electricity. Energy. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.033

Vickrey, W. 1971. Responsive Pricing of Public Utility Services. The Bell Journal of

Economics and Management Science. 2(1): 337-346

Faruqui, A. 2010. The Ethics of Dynamic Pricing. The Electricity Journal. 23(6): 13-27

Herter, K., McAuliffe, P., Rosenfeld, A., 2007. An exploratory analysis of California

residential consumer response to critical peak pricing of electricity. Energy, 32(1):

-34

Hogan, W.W. 2010. Fairness and Dynamic Pricing: Comments. The Electricity Journal.

(6): 28-35

Felder, F.A. 2010. The Practical Equity Implications of Advanced Metering Infrastructure.

The Electricity Journal. 23(6): 56-64

Brockway N. 2008. Advanced Metering Infrastructure: What Regulators Need to

Know About Its Value to Residential Consumers. National Regulatory Research

Institute, Report 08-03. http://nrri.org/pubs/multiutility/advanced_metering_

-03.pdf

Brand, S.A. 2010. Dynamic Pricing for Residential Electric Consumers: A Ratepayer

Advocate’s Perspective. The Electricity Journal. 23(6): 50-55

Stokey, E., Zeckhauser R. 1974. A Primer for Policy Analysis. Norton. New York.

Kaldor, N. 1939. Welfare Propositions in Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons

of Utility. Economic Journal. 49(195): 549–552.

Hicks, J. 1939. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal. 49(196):

–712.

Blumstein, C. 2011. Energy Efficiency, Information Technology, and the Electricity

System. European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. http://uc- ciee.org/

downloads/Energy_Efficiency_and_IT_Blumstein.pdf

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under

risk, Econometrica 47(2): 263–291.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

Hanser, P.Q. 2010. On Dynamic Pricing: A Clash of Beliefs? The Electricity Journal.

(6): 36-38

George, S.S. 2007. Rebuttal Testimony of Stephen S. George, Ph.D., Nov. 9, 2007,

Maine Public Utilities Commission, Central Maine Power Company, Request for

New Alternative Rate Plan, Docket No. 2007-215. http://www.env.state.ma.us/

dpu/docs/electric/09-32/91809agrnga3b.pdf

Section
Articles