Personnel Risk in Assessing the Effectiveness of Ground-based Tests of Complex Technical Systems

Authors

  • Andrei V. Kirillin Russian Federation, Moscow, Volokolamskoe shosse, 4, Russia
  • Pavel A. Iosifov Russian Federation, Zhukovsky, Bazhenova st. 10A, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/jgeu0975-1416.1012

Keywords:

Testing effectiveness, human reliability, reliability growth model, logistic distribution

Abstract

The article provides an original approach to taking into account the risk of
personnel in the process of assessing the effectiveness of testing complex
technical systems. Models of assessment and predictive models of personnel
risks based on the study of their qualification level are considered. The advan-
tages and limitations of the given approach to the analysis and accounting of
personnel risks are shown.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrei V. Kirillin, Russian Federation, Moscow, Volokolamskoe shosse, 4, Russia

Andrei V. Kirillin B.Sc., M.Sc. From 2014 for nowadays – senior lecturer at
chair “Test and Operation Technology” of Moscow Aviation Institute. From
2022 for nowadays – reliability engineer at Avionic Department of LLC
NIK. Scientific Interests areas are in system safety assessment and human
reliability analysis.

Pavel A. Iosifov, Russian Federation, Zhukovsky, Bazhenova st. 10A, Russia

Pavel A. Iosifov Graduated Moscow State Aviation and Technological Uni-
versity named after K.E. Tsiolkovsky at 1997. Since 2001 PhD degree in
Aviation Engines and Powerplans. Since 2014 head of faculty “Aerospace
high technologies and manufactures” of Moscow Aviation Institute. Scientific
Interests areas are in information systems and information support of flight
vecehles production, tests and service.

References

Lind M. ‘The Mathematical Model of Testing Products’, Questions of

Space-rocket Techniques, pp. 3–14, No. 12, 1970.

Krinetsky E.I, and others. Flight tests of aircraft control systems. p. 193,

Aleksandrovskaya L.N. and others. Theoretical basis of the test and

experimental development of complex technical systems, p. 735. 2003.

Krinetsky E.I. and others. Flight tests of rockets and spacecraft. p. 462,

Krinetsky E.I. and others. Aircraft Testing Fundamentals. p. 312, 1989.

Hollnagel E. 1996 ‘Reliability Analysis and Operator Modelling’,

Reliability Engineering and System Safety, pp.327-337, No52, 1996.

Liao H., Forester J., and others. ‘Assessment of HRA method predictions

against operating crew performance: Part I: Study background, design

and methodology’. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 191,

Liao H., Forester J., and others. ‘Assessment of HRA method predictions

against operating crew performance: Part II: Overall simulator data,

HRA method predictions and intra-method comparison’. Reliability

Engineering and System Safety, 191, 2019.

Liao H., Forester J., and others. ‘Assessment of HRA method predic-

tions against operating crew performance: Part III: Conclusions and

achievements’. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 191, 2019.

Zang L., He X., Dai L., and others. ‘The Simulatior experimental study

on the Operator Reliability of Qinhan nuclear power plant’. Reliability

Engineering and System Safety, pp. 252-259, No 92, 2007.

Jirgl M., Havlikova M., and others. ‘Monte Carlo Reliability Analysis

of System with Human Operator’. IFAC-PaperOnLine, pp. 272–277,

–25, 2016.

Avanesov V.S. ‘The problem of psychological tests’, Soviet Education,

pp. 6–23, vol. 22, no. 6, 1980.

Donihue M. Meeting the Standards: An Analysis of Eight Grade

Educational Assesment Test Scores in Maine, 2006.

Haertel E. ‘Tests, Test Scores, and Constructs’. Educational Psycholo-

gist, pp. 1–14, No 53, 2018.

Violato C. Statistics and test score interpretation, 2018.

Thissen D., Wainer H. (Eds.). Test Scoring. Journal of Educational

Measurement, pp. 265–268, 39(3), 2002.

A. V. Kirillin and P. A. Iosifov

Engelhardt L., Goldhammer F. ‘Validating Test Score Interpretations

Using Time Information’. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019.

Kleinberg J., Raghu M. ‘Team Performance with Test Scores’. Proceed-

ings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computa-

tion – EC ’15, 2015.

Rasch G.E. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment

Tests, 1993.

Peterson J.K. ‘Logistics Models’. Cognitive Science and Technology,

pp. 257–277, 2016.

Hand D. J., van der Linden W. J., & Hambleton R. K. Handbook of

Modern Item Response Theory. Biometrics, pp. 1680, 54(4), 1998.

Aleksandrovskaya L.N., Kirillin A.V., Shumskaya L.P. ‘Mathematical

models in assessing the effectiveness of continuing education’. Quality.

Innovations. Education, pp. 30–34, No8 (111), 2014.

Aleksandrovskaya L.N., Kirillin A.V., Iosifov P.A., Mitrofanova I.P. ‘A

model for evaluating the effectiveness of retraining of specialists in

multilevel studying’. Quality. Innovations. Education, pp. 3–10, 1(116),

Aleksandrovskaya L.N., Kirillin A.V., Borisova E.V. ‘Statistical anal-

ysis of homogeneity of students’ preparedness’. Quality. Innovations.

Education, pp. 5–1, 6(157), 2018.

Tsoularis A., Wallace J. Analysis of logistic growth models. Mathemat-

ical Biosciences, pp. 21–55, 179(1), 2002.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-02

How to Cite

Kirillin, A. V., & Iosifov, P. A. (2022). Personnel Risk in Assessing the Effectiveness of Ground-based Tests of Complex Technical Systems. Journal of Graphic Era University, 10(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.13052/jgeu0975-1416.1012

Issue

Section

Articles